![]() The volume not only makes available a broad selection of works by a great scholar, but uses those works as a means of drawing out new ideas and perspective that have germinated from Tiersma’s work. The book is organized around the major areas that make up Tiersma’s body of writing: legal language and its history, the language of contracts and wills, the meaning of silence in law, consenting, defaming, interpreting laws, language and criminal justice, and the language of jury instructions. These commentaries use Tiersma’s work as a springboard to engage with the significant issues that Tiersma himself raised during his career.īecause Tiersma’s work was itself so broad, the contributors to this book range in their expertise and include scholars in law, linguistics, criminology, philosophy, anthropology, psychology, history and medicine. Reprinted are 17 short excerpts from Tiersma’s writings accompanied by 32 commentaries produced for this volume. This book doubles as a tribute to Tiersma’s great work and as a collection of short, poignant essays by leading scholars from around the world on important questions of language and law. ![]() His work has been enormously influential in areas ranging from the formation of contracts to the language of criminal justice to the law of defamation. Trained in both law and linguistics, Tiersma was uniquely perceptive in extracting the ways in which the use of language influences legal practice and theory. In the quarter century that he wrote about issues concerning language and law, Peter Tiermsa (1952 - 2014) made his mark in one important area of inquiry after another. Ainsworth), 2015, Oxford University Press Through his examination of these cases, Shuy demonstrates the significant contribution of linguistic analytical methodology to the understanding of language evidence and its success in revealing willful uses of fraudulent language to achieve financial gain. The cases chosen for this volume hinge on recorded language evidence, making them particularly relevant for linguistic analysis, and include cases of government contracts, EPA regulations, foreign corrupt business practices, trade secrets, money laundering, securities trading, art theft, and price fixing. He examines speech events, schemas, agendas, speech acts, conversational strategies, as well as smaller language units such as sentences, phrases, words, and sounds, and discusses how these can play a major role in deciding fraud cases. He discusses here eight cases that he himself has consulted on, and that illustrate how linguistics can help to solve the various problems that arise in trying to define fraudulent language in the context of law. In The Language of Fraud Cases, Roger Shuy follows the now well-established format of his previous volumes on language and law. The Language of Fraud Cases, 2016, Oxford University Press ![]() Although police officers and prosecutors are not permitted to use trickery or coercion to deceive those with whom they interact, their uses of deceptive ambiguity demonstrated in this book have gone largely unnoticed. In undercover operations the government approves some types of intentional deception, but their deceptive uses of ambiguity are not often recognized. The book describes fifteen criminal investigations that demonstrate how police, prosecutors, and undercover agents used deceptive ambiguity with their subjects and targets resulting in misrepresentations to their subjects in the ways government officials misrepresented and handled speech events, schemas, agendas, speech acts, lexicon, and grammar. This book does not disagree but instead tries to even the playing field by demonstrating how police use deceptive ambiguity during their interviews with suspects and how prosecutors use it as they question defendants in courtroom settings. Officials of law enforcement often complain that their suspects and defendants are deceptive. Roger Shuy - Research Professor of Linguistics - Forensic Booksĭeceptive Ambiguity by Police and Prosecutors, 2017, Oxford University Press
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |